Murray v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Finance Act 1916 - Articles : S-46

REFERS TO

• Attorney General v Theobald
• Attorney General v The Marquis of Hertford

APPLIED in

• Pye v Minister for Lands for New South Wales
• Enmore Estates Ltd v Darsan

FOLLOWED in

• Kota Kinabalu Industries Sdn Bhd v Director General of Inland Revenue
• Chin Teck Plantations Bhd. v Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 1918 SC HL 111
• 34 TLR 425
• [1918] AC 541

REFERRED in

• Kent County Council v Kenworthy; Kingsway Investments (Kent) Ltd v Kent County Council

CONSIDERED in

• Bata Shoe Company Guyana, Ltd et Al v Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Attorney General Diamond Liquors Ltd et Al v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Attorney General

This document cites

• Attorney General v Theobald
• Attorney General v The Marquis of Hertford
• Finance (No. 2) Act 1915
• Finance Act 1917