Murphy v Hurly

Core Citations

---

DISTINGUISHES

• Melles & Company v Holme

REFERS TO

• London and South Western Railway Company v Flower
• Manchester Bonded Warehouse Company v Carr
• Lyle v Smith

[See more]

• Ricketts v Enfield Churchwardens
• Tredway v Machin

CONSIDERS

• Hugall v McLean
• Torrens v Walker

CITES

• Owners of the "Tasmania" v Owners of the "City of Corinth"

APPLIES

• Vyse v Wakefield

FOLLOWS

• Makin v Watkinson

APPROVES

• Cullen v Dublin United Tramways Company

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1921] 2 IR 335

CONSIDERED in

• Edwards v Kumarasamy
• Tsb Bank Plc v Arthur Ladsky

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Murphy v Hurly

REVERSED in

• Murphy v Hurly

This document cites

---

• Coulson v Disborough
• Tredway v Machin
• Cullen v Dublin United Tramways Company
• Vyse v Wakefield
• Manchester Bonded Warehouse Company v Carr



See all quotations

• Melles & Company v Holme
• Ricketts v Enfield Churchwardens
• London and South Western Railway Company v Flower
• Makin v Watkinson
• Owners of the "Tasmania" v Owners of the "City of Corinth"
• Torrens v Walker
• Hugall v McLean
• Lyle v Smith