Extract
Multifactors, multiconfusion? Refining "likelihood of confusion" factors for reverse-confusion trademark infringement claims to achieve more consistent and predictable results.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 657 F.2d 482 (1st Cir. 1981), 80-1744, Pignons S.A. de Mecanique de Precision v. Polaroid Corp.
- Federal Cases - 163 F.3d 27 (1st Cir. 1998), 98-1334, I.P. Lund Trading ApS v. Kohler Co.
- Federal Cases - 774 F.Supp. 49 (D.Mass. 1990), Civ. A. 90-10652, Tanel Corp. v. Reebok Intern., Ltd.
- Federal Cases - 279 F.2d 607 (2nd Cir. 1960), 223, Avon Shoe Co. v. David Crystal, Inc.
- Federal Cases - 287 F.2d 492 (2nd Cir. 1961), 162, Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Elecs. Corp.