Mohamed Ibrahim v PP

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Lim Chin Aik v The Queen
• Lim Chin Aik v R

REFERS TO

• R v Barraclough
• Sherras v De Rutzen

FOLLOWS

• Brooks v Mason
• Frailey v Charlton
• Galletly v Laird. McGown v Robertson

[See more]

• The King against John Dixon
• R v Hicklin
• R v Reiter
• Barraclough v Brown
• R v Bishop
• R v Martin Secker & Warburg Ltd
• R v Woodrow
• Sherras v De Rutzen
• Blaker v Tillstone
• Hobbs v Winchester Corporation

REFERRED in

• Siti Noor Aishah bt Atam lwn Pendakwa Raya
• Pendakwa Raya lwn Siti Noor Aishah bt Atam
• PP; Sim Poh Ho and Others

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1963] MLJ 289

This document cites

• R v Martin Secker & Warburg Ltd
• Lim Chin Aik v R
• Hobbs v Winchester Corporation
• Lim Chin Aik v The Queen
• R v Reiter



See all quotations

• R v Woodrow
• Sherras v De Rutzen
• Frailey v Charlton
• Blaker v Tillstone
• R v Barraclough
• R v Bishop
• Sherras v De Rutzen
• Barraclough v Brown
• The King against John Dixon
• R v Hicklin
• Brooks v Mason
• Galletly v Laird. McGown v Robertson