Mohamed Emran bin Mohamed Ali v Public Prosecutor

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• How Poh Sun v PP
• Hua Khian Ceramics Tiles Supplies Pte Ltd v Torie Construction Pte Ltd
• Johnson & Johnson v Uni-Charm Kabushiki Kaisha (Uni-Charm Corp)

[See more]

• R v Horseferry Road Magistrates Court ex parte Bennett (A.P.)
• R v Looseley
• R v Sang
• Wong Keng Leong Rayney v Law Society of Singapore
• Public Prosecutor v Tan Kiam Peng

CONSIDERS

• DPP v Marshall

CITES

• R v Looseley
• Nottingham City Council v Amin
• Ridgeway v R

[See more]

• R v Sang (on Appeal from HM Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))

FOLLOWS

• Public Prosecutor v Taw Cheng Kong
• Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guat Neo Phyllis
• Brink's Inc and Another v Singapore Airlines Ltd and Another

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2009] 2 LRC 484
• [2008] SGHC 103
• [2008] 4 SLR 411

REFERRED in

• Lim Chooi Huat v Public Prosecutor

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales - Article 6
• R v Horseferry Road Magistrates Court ex parte Bennett (A.P.)
• R v Looseley
• R v Sang
• R v Looseley



See all quotations

• R v Sang (on Appeal from HM Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))
• DPP v Marshall
• Lee Lee Chong v PP
• Public Prosecutor v EE Boon Keat
• Ridgeway v R
• Nottingham City Council v Amin
• Government of Malaysia; Malaysian Bar and Another
• Public Prosecutor v Tan Kiam Peng
• Wong Keng Leong Rayney v Law Society of Singapore
• Johnson & Johnson v Uni-Charm Kabushiki Kaisha (Uni-Charm Corp)
• Public Prosecutor v Taw Cheng Kong
• How Poh Sun v PP
• Hua Khian Ceramics Tiles Supplies Pte Ltd v Torie Construction Pte Ltd
• Wong Keng Leong Rayney v Law Society of Singapore
• Brink's Inc and Another v Singapore Airlines Ltd and Another
• Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guat Neo Phyllis
• Penal Code 1871
• Evidence Act 1893