Extract
Minister van Landbou-Tegniese Dienste v Scholtz
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REPORTS OPINION
This document cites
-
Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper
-
Hamlyn & Company v Wood & Company
-
Jenkins against Tucker
-
Samuel Gurney, David Barclay Chapman, Samuel Gurney the Younger, and Henry Edmund Gurney against Heinrich Theodor Behrend, Paul Augustus Adolphe Behrend, and Maximilian Behrend
-
The Queen against Charles Robert Badger
See all quotations
-
The Queen, on the Prosecution of Hinchlife, against The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company
-
Chollet against Hoffman
-
Douglas v Baynes
-
Mary Ann Harman against Edward Davey Johnson
-
John Coope, Joseph Coope, William Jesser Coope, Charlesson, Piercy the Elder, Piercy the Younger, Pritzler, and Brown, against Eyre, Atkinson, Walton, Hattersley, Stephens, and Pugh
-
Vernon, Widow, against Wynne
-
Barnabas Plein & Co v Sol Jacobson & Son
-
Van Vuuren v Boshoff
-
Maree v Diedericks
-
West Witwatersrand Areas Ltd v Roos
-
Cole v Government of the Union of SA
-
Dutch Reformed Church Council v Crocker
-
West End Diamonds Ltd v Johannesburg Stock Exchange
-
Smith v Williams; Smith v Kok
-
Grosvenor Motors (Border) Ltd v Visser
-
Union Government (Minister of Railways and Harbours) v Faux Ltd
-
Hackett v G & G Radio and Refrigerator Corporation
-
Shill v Milner
-
Administrator (Transvaal) v Industrial & Commercial Timber & Supply Co Ltd
-
Jaffe & Co (Pty) Ltd v Bocchi and Another
-
Simmons, NO v Gilbert Hamer & Co Ltd
-
Dickinson Motors (Pty) Ltd v Oberholzer
-
Schmidt v Dwyer
