Millar v Dickson; Payne and Others v Heywood

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : SCH-1
• Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995 - Articles : S-14
• Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 - Articles : S-103

[See more]

• Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1971 - Articles : S-11
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-1
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• Scotland Act 1998 - Articles : S-126
• Scotland Act 1998 - Articles : S-44
• Scotland Act 1998 - Articles : S-57
• Scotland Act 1998 - Articles : S-98
• Scotland Act 1998
• Scotland Act 1998 - Articles : SCH-6
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1971
• Starrs v Ruxton
• De Cubbe v Belgium (Investigating Judge) (A/86)

REVERSES

• Millar v Dickson; Payne and Others v Heywood

CONSIDERS

• Evans v Bartlam
• Clancy v Caird
• DAVID J. HOWDLE (Procurator Fiscal, Dumfries) Complainer against ADAM CHRISTOPHER BEATTIE

[See more]

• Brown v Stott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline)
• Doherty v McGlennan
• Law v Chartered Institute of Patent Agents
• R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2)
• R v Gough (Robert)
• R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions

REFERS TO

• Rimmer v HM Advocate
• Skeen v Fullarton

[See more]

• Howdle v Beattie
• Jones v Randall
• Bradford v MacLeod
• Doherty v McGlennan
• Caledonian Railway Company v Ramsay
• DEWEER v. BELGIUM

CITES

• William Dimes, - Appellant: The Proprietors of the Grand Junction Canal, T. E. Skidmore, A. Boham, and W. W. Martin, - Respondents
• Martindale v Falker

[See more]

APPLIES

• Locobail (U.K.) Ltd v Bayfield Properties Ltd

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Locobail (U.K.) Ltd v Bayfield Properties Ltd
• R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2)
• R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions
• Evans v Bartlam



See all quotations

• R v Gough
• Rimmer v HM Advocate
• DAVID J. HOWDLE (Procurator Fiscal, Dumfries) Complainer against ADAM CHRISTOPHER BEATTIE
• Millar v Dickson; Payne and Others v Heywood
• Jones v Randall
• Law v Chartered Institute of Patent Agents
• William Dimes, - Appellant: The Proprietors of the Grand Junction Canal, T. E. Skidmore, A. Boham, and W. W. Martin, - Respondents
• Caledonian Railway Company v Ramsay
• Starrs v Ruxton
• Skeen v Fullarton
• Howdle v Beattie
• Doherty v McGlennan
• Martindale v Falker
• Clancy v Caird
• Doherty v McGlennan
• Bradford v MacLeod
• R v Gough (Robert)
• Brown v Stott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline)
• Scotland Act 1998
• Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1971
• Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rules) 1996
• Human Rights Act 1998
• De Cubbe v Belgium (Investigating Judge) (A/86)