Medellin v. Texas: implications of the Supreme Court's decision for the United States and the rule of law in international affairs.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 134 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1998), 96-25, Breard v. Pruett
• Federal Cases - 949 F.Supp. 1255 (E.D.Va. 1996), C. A. 396CV366, Breard v. Netherland
• Federal Cases - 371 F.3d 270 (5th Cir. 2004), 03-20687, Medellin v. Dretke
• Federal Cases - 523 U.S. 371 (1998), 97-8214, Breard v. Greene
• Federal Cases - 526 U.S. 111 (1999), 127, Federal Republic of Germany v. United States



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 544 U.S. 660 (2005), 04-5928, Medellin v. Dretke
• Federal Cases - 548 U.S. 331 (2006), 04-10566, Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
• Federal Cases - 552 U.S. 491 (2008), 06-984, Medellin v. Texas
• Oklahoma - 120 P.3d 1184 (Okla.Crim.App. 2005), PCD-2004-442, Torres v. State
• Texas - 223 S.W.3d 315 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006), AP-75207, Ex parte Medellin
• Sage (UK) Ltd v Bacco
• Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes
• Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
• United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
• Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
• Statute of the International Court of Justice