Mead v Clarke Chapman & Company Ltd

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Jagprit Randhawa and Others v The Queen

APPLIES

• Peacock v Amusement Equip. Company Ltd
• Baker v Dalgleish Steam Shipping Company

CONSIDERS

• Fatal Accidents Act 1846

CLARIFIED in

• Rawlinson v Babcock & Wilcox Ltd
• Practice Direction (Vendor and Purchaser Summonses)

REFERRED in

• The National Insurance Company of New Zealand Ltd v Espagne
• Curwen v James
• National Bank Trust (a company incorporated in Russia) v Ilya Yurov

[See more]

• Baker v Willoughby

CONSIDERED in

• Watson v Willmott
• Roads & Traffic Authority v Jelfs
• Feletti v Kontoulas

[See more]

• Byrne v Houlihan and Another
• MIDCO HOLDINGS Ltd and RONALD ANDREW MIDDLETON v KEITH ANTHONY PIPER ; Midco Holdings v Piper
• Hay v Hughes
• Stanley v Saddique
• Samaroo et Al v Jagdeo
• Grenier v Chin and Shaw
• Fitzsimons v Telecom Éireann
• Deonarine v Narine

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1956] 1 All ER 44
• [1956] 1 WLR 76

CITED in

• De Sales v Ingrilli
• Deonarine v Narine
• Hubah and Others v Ramjass

DISTINGUISHED in

• Reincke v Gray

APPLIED in

• Jenner v Allen West & Company Ltd

This document cites

---

• Jagprit Randhawa and Others v The Queen
• Peacock v Amusement Equip. Company Ltd
• Baker v Dalgleish Steam Shipping Company
• Fatal Accidents Act 1846