McKay v Essex Area Health Authority

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Benham v Gambling
• Re Whittall
• Rose v Ford

REFERS TO

• Riches v DPP
• Metropolitan Bank v Pooley
• Hubbuck & Sons Ltd v Wilkinson, Heywood & Clark Ltd

[See more]

• Benham v Gambling
• Croke v Wiseman
• Attorney General of the Duchy of Lancaster v London and North Western Railway Company
• Distillers Company (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson
• Schmidt v Home Office ; Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs
• Rose v Ford

APPLIES

• Drummond-Jackson v British Medical Association

CONSIDERS

• Re B (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment)
• Abortion Act 1967
• Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976

[See more]

• Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929

DISTINGUISHES

• Dyson v Attorney General

REFERRED in

• Anderson v Forth Valley Health Board
• Hambro Life Assurance Plc v White Young & Partners and Others
• Allan v Greater Glasgow Health Board

[See more]

• Millar (P's curator bonis) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board
• Allen v Bloomsbury Health Authority
• Re Castleburn Ltd
• Waller v James
• Rance v Mid-Downs Health Authority and Another
• Al-Nakib Investments (Jersey) Ltd and Another v Longcroft and Others
• Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja v Suasa Kristal (M) Berhad
• Nordin Sidin v Mohd Khaled Nordin and Others
• Deepak Jaikishan Jaikishan Rewachand v Dato’ Seri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak and Others
• Das v Ganju
• Lee Chin Yong v Medical DefenceMalaysia Bhd and Another
• B v Islington Health Authority
• Clarke v Bruce Lance & Company
• Whitehead v Searle and Another
• McFarlane v Tayside Health Board
• Evie Toombes (a protected party who sues by her mother and litigation friend, Caroline Toombes) v Dr Philip Mitchell (sued in his own right and as a partner in, and on behalf of all the partners in the Hawthorn Medical Practice)
• Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority v First Tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) (Criminal Injuries Compensation) Y (by his Mother and Litigation Friend) (Interested Party)

CITED in

• Das v Ganju
• Millar (P's curator bonis) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board
• Harriton (by her tutor) v Stephens

[See more]

• Thake v Maurice
• Das v Ganju
• Das v Ganju
• Cattanach v Melchior
• Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi and Bros Company v Saad Investments Company Ltd and Others
• Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust
• Cattanach v Melchior
• Harriton v Stephens
• Heidi Crowter v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• R (Pretty) v DPP

CONSIDERED in

• Hodge Jones & Allen (A Firm)(Claimant/Part 20 Defendant) v Ms Eileen McLaughlin (Defendant/Part 20 Claimant)
• Pratima Rani Das (Plaintiff/Respondentdr) v Durga Ganju
• Nunnerley and Another v Warrington Health Authority and Another

[See more]

• Harriton v Stephens
• Sheng Lu v BVCF Management Ltd
• Mrs Jean Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey (A Firm)
• R (Pretty) v DPP
• Williams and Humbert Ltd v W. & H. Trade Marks (Jersey) Ltd
• Yaseen et Al v Attorney-general et Al
• Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi and Brothers Company (‘Ahab’) Plaintiff v Saad Investments Company Ltd Maan Al-Sanea and Others Defendants
• Rosalyn Brown v Cotswold Group Ltd
• Between Sheng Lu Appellant v BVCF Management Ltd Respondent
• Between Sheng Lu Plaintiff v BVCF Management Ltd Defendant

APPLIED in

• Udale v Bloomsbury Area Health Authority
• Grupo Torras SA v Bank of Butterfield Intl (Cayman) Ltd
• CH Ltd v F

FOLLOWED in

• Chan Min Swee v Melawangi Sdn Bhd
• Pengiran Othman Shah v Karambunai Resorts Sdn Bhd
• Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja v Kesatuan Kakitangan Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja

[See more]

• Leong Hup Holdings Bhd and other appeals; Tuan Haji Ishak bin Ismail and Others
• JU and Another v See Tho Kai Yin
• RCB v Thai Asia Fund Ltd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1982] 2 All ER 771
• [1982] QB 1166
• [1982] 2 WLR 890

DISTINGUISHED in

• Re J (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment)

This document cites

---

• Riches v DPP
• Schmidt v Home Office ; Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs
• Benham v Gambling
• Re B (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment)
• Rose v Ford



See all quotations

• Drummond-Jackson v British Medical Association
• Hubbuck & Sons Ltd v Wilkinson, Heywood & Clark Ltd
• Metropolitan Bank v Pooley
• Benham v Gambling
• Dyson v Attorney General
• Attorney General of the Duchy of Lancaster v London and North Western Railway Company
• Croke v Wiseman
• Rose v Ford
• Distillers Company (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson
• Re Whittall
• Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976
• Abortion Act 1967
• Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929