Mayo-Perrott v Mayo-Perrott

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Constitution of Ireland 1937/Bunreacht na hÉireann - Articles : S-41

REFERS TO

• Raulin v Fischer
• Emanuel v Symon

CONSIDERED in

• G McG v DW and AR (notice party) (No 1)
• Stern v National Australia Bank
• Norsemeter Holding as v Pieter Boele [No.1]

[See more]

• The Adoption Act 2010, Sections 49(1) and 49(3) and A (A Minor) and B (A Minor): Adoption Authority of Ireland v C and D and the Attorney General
• D. (K. E.) (Otherwise C.) v C.(M.)
• Flightlease (Ireland) Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) v Companies Act
• McG v DW (Divorce: Recognition)
• M.H. v G.H.
• M (D) v F (C) v & A G
• McG (G) v W (D)
• Flightlease (Ireland) Ltd
• Clancy v Min Social Welfare
• Bank of Ireland v Caffin
• T. v L
• Sachs v Standard Chartered Bank (Ireland) Ltd
• C(K) v C(M)
• Ross v Ross

APPLIED in

• Breen (orse. Smith) v Breen

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 93 ILTR 185
• [1958] IR 336 (Digest)
• [1958] IR 336

CITED in

• H.A.H. v S.A.A.
• Re Fleming
• W v W

[See more]

• G McG v DW and AR
• Dalton v Dalton
• K(P) v K(T)

DISTINGUISHED in

• G v G

REFERRED in

• Attorney General (S.P.U.C.) v Open Door Counselling Ltd
• Kd (Otherwise C) v Mc
• H.A.H. v S.A.A. (Validity of marriage)

This document cites

• Thorne v Motor Trade Association
• Harvey v Farnie
• Kaufman v Gerson
• Buchanan Ltd and Another v McVey
• Pemberton v Hughes



See all quotations

• Re McComiskey; Gibson v Paterson
• Aksionairnoye Obschestvo A. M. Luther v Sagor & Company
• Re Macartney. Macfarlane v Macartney (No 2)
• Emanuel v Symon
• R v Hammersmith Superintendent Registrar of Marriages
• Santos v Illidge and Others
• Raulin v Fischer
• Papadopoulos v Papadopoulos
• Trial of Russell (Earl)
• Re E. E. L. (an Infant)
• McDonnell v McDonnell
• Rousillon v Rousillon
• Re Selot's Trust
• Edelstyn v Coleman
• Simons v Simons
• Green v Green
• Grell and Another v Levy
• Armitage v Attorney General. Gillig v Gillig
• Beatty v Beatty
• McColl v Heron
• Le Mesurier v Le Mesurier
• Sinclair's Divorce Bill
• Sinclair v Sinclair