Matadeen v Pointu
Linked as:
Extract
Matadeen v Pointu
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
DISTINGUISHES
CONSIDERS
- Société United Docks v Government of Mauritius
- Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
[See more]
CITED in
- Carrimjee v Financial Conduct Authority
- The Queen (on the application of Carolyn Challis) v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
- R (AC) v Berkshire West Primary Care Trust Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervenor)
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- R (Montana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- The Queen v The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain and Others
- R the Law Society of England and Wales v The Lord Chancellor He Legal Services Commission (Interested Party)
[See more]
REFERRED in
- R (Montana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Maria Chin Abdullah v Ketua Pengarah Imigresen and Another
- Letitia Bosman v Public Prosecutor
[See more]
APPLIED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
COMMENTED in