Marshall v Blackpool Corporation

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Rowley v Tottenham Urban Council
• St. Mary, Newington v Jacobs

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Marshall v Blackpool Corporation

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1934] UKHL J0625-1
• 50 TLR 483
• [1934] 98 JP 376

[See more]

• [1935] AC 16

CITED in

• Edgington v Swindon Corporation
• Cusack v Harrow London Borough Council
• Rolston Michael Claimant v Jo Hutchens Defendant [ECSC]

CONSIDERED in

• London County Council v Cutts
• R v Ellesmere Port and Neston Borough Council ex parte Jeremy and Vivien Stephens
• Minister for Education and Training v Tanner

[See more]

• Kildare County Council v Hamwood Estates Ltd & Red House Filling Station Ltd
• Murray v Wellington City Council Hc Wn
• Chuan Wu v Body Corporate 366611
• Patrick Joseph Cusack v London Borough of Harrow
• Cusack v Harrow London Borough Council
• Ching Garage Ltd v Chingford Corporation

DISTINGUISHED in

• Burchall v Shire of Sherbrooke

REFERRED in

• Fortin and Others v Delahunty
• Christopher Price v Jonathan Nunn
• Osbourne Roberts Claimant v Romeo Roberts Attorney General Defendants [ECSC]

[See more]

• Arla Foods Ltd v Persons Unknown Who are, without the Consent of the Claimants, Entering or Remaining on Land and in Buildings on Any of the Sites Listed in Schedule 2 of the Claim Form (“The Sites”), Those Being:

This document cites

• Rowley v Tottenham Urban Council
• St. Mary, Newington v Jacobs