De Maroussem and Others v Commissioner of Income Tax

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Emmot enforme en le Eschequer v Fulwood sur le statute de 37 H. 8. de ceo que
• Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus
• R v Downes

CONSIDERS

• Finance Act 1993
• Income Tax Act 1952 - Articles : S-47
• McClelland v Taxation Commissioner

REFERS TO

• Hillenbrand v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

APPLIES

• National Assistance Board v Prisk
• R v Downes

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 22/07/2004 Daily Cases
• [13/09/2004] TLR 3
• [2004] 1 WLR 2865

REFERRED in

• Adhinath Singh Lutchumun (Appellants) Director General of the Mauritius Revenue Authority (Respondent) Director General of the Mauritius Revenue Authority (Appellant) Adhinath Singh Lutchumun (Respondents)

CONSIDERED in

• De Maroussem (Legal Representative of Succession) v Director General, Mauritius Revenue Authority

This document cites

• R v Downes
• Hillenbrand v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• R v Downes
• McClelland v Taxation Commissioner
• National Assistance Board v Prisk



See all quotations

• Emmot enforme en le Eschequer v Fulwood sur le statute de 37 H. 8. de ceo que
• Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus
• Income Tax Act 1952
• Finance Act 1993