Maharaj v Jai Chand

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Chalmers v Pardoe

REFERS TO

• Gissing v Gissing
• Moses v Macferlan
• Plimmer v Mayor of Wellington

FOLLOWS

• Kulamma v Manadan

CITED in

• Ungurian v Lesnoff
• Isadore Browne Appellant v Maria Roseta Browne Respondent [ECSC]

CONSIDERED in

• Gracie and Others v DeSilva 2001 Civil Jur. No. 14
• Cornelis Jan Noordennen v Mavis Rofe
• Hansen v Noble

[See more]

• Varcity Solutions Pty Ltd v Gulliver; Varcity Solutions Pty Ltd v Jagbo Pty Ltd
• Sweeney v He
• Awad v Awad (No 2)
• Frohlich v Herborn
• Jin v Yang
• Guojin Huang v Jinghong Wei (No 2)
• Abdi v Abdi
• Minassian v Minassian
• Penzikis v Brown
• Thompson v Leigh
• Lee v Li
• R (J) (Ward of Court)
• Van Dyke v Sidhu
• Smith v Holiday Construction Company Ltd
• Galati v Deans and Others
• Imam Ali Islamic Centre v Imam Ali Islamic Centre Inc.
• Clayton v Clayton
• Rbtt Bank Ltd v Ragoonanan Arjoon
• Bijkerk Investments Pty Ltd v Bikic
• Shepherd v Doolan & OrsShepherd v Doolan and Another; Est. Doolan
• Michael Gregory Jones as Liquidator of SBH Australia Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) and Another v Joseph Cummins
• Christian Cottoy of Bequia Claimant v Kooth Haywood Oswell Haywood of Park Hill Defendants

REFERRED in

• UMW Toyota (M) Sdn Bhd v Chow Weng Thiem
• Umrish Ltd v Mr Bobby Gill

FOLLOWED in

• Cheng Hang Guan v Perumahan Farlim (Penang) Sdn Bhd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1986) 70 NR 235
• [1986] 3 All ER 107
• [1986] AC 898

[See more]

• [1986] 3 WLR 440