Lungrin (Iris) v Monelal & Valentine (Olive)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Hagee (London) Ltd v A. B. Erikson and Larson
• Wakeham v Mackenzie

[See more]

• Boyd v Mayor, etc., of Wellington
• Tataurangi Tairuakena v Mua Carr
• Garrard v Tuck

REFERS TO

• Facchini v Bryson
• Hughes v Griffin
• Day v Day

[See more]

• Rains v Buxton
• Vida Bowes v Allan Spencer
• JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom (44302/02)
• Inwards v Baker
• Bourke v Roberts
• Pascoe v Turner
• Frazer v Walker

CONSIDERS

• Limitation Act 1939 - Articles : S-5
• Limitation Act 1939

[See more]

• Rose Hall Ltd v Reeves

CITES

• Ives (E. R) Investment Ltd v High
• Moses v Lovegrove
• Archer Et Ux v Georgiana Holdings Ltd

APPLIES

• Chisholm v Hall
• Dillwyn v Llewelyn

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2004] 4 JJC 0206

This document cites

• Hughes v Griffin
• JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom (44302/02)
• Inwards v Baker
• Pascoe v Turner
• Facchini v Bryson



See all quotations

• Sir J. W. Ramsden, Bart. et Al v Dyson et Al
• Hagee (London) Ltd v A. B. Erikson and Larson
• Dillwyn v Llewelyn
• Archer Et Ux v Georgiana Holdings Ltd
• Vida Bowes v Allan Spencer
• Bourke v Roberts
• Rains v Buxton
• Frazer v Walker
• Wakeham v Mackenzie
• Chisholm v Hall
• Day v Day
• Ives (E. R) Investment Ltd v High
• Moses v Lovegrove
• Rose Hall Ltd v Reeves
• Judith Garrard, Widow Demandant, Tuck, Tenant
• Gardener et Al v Lewis
• Garrard v Tuck
• Limitation Act 1939