Lum Siew & Sons Sdn Bhd; Zasalim Development Sdn Bhd

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Labasama Group (M) Sdn Bhd v Insofex Sdn Bhd

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• See Teow Guan v Kian Joo Holdings Sdn Bhd

REFERS TO

• Soosan Trading Company Ltd v Tawau Auto Sdn Bhd and Others
• TAC Construction & Trading v Bennes Engineering Bhd
• Paya Terubong Estate Sdn Bhd; Tan Geok Khoon & Gerard Francis Robless

[See more]

• Tambun Mining Company Ltd; Toeh Kee Keong
• Associated Metal Smelters Ltd; Tham Cheow Toh
• Tneoh Hong Seng v Dayani Sdn Bhd
• Tropiland Sdn Bhd v DCB Bank
• Wu Shu Chen v Raja Zainal Abidin bin Raja Hussin
• Sandakan Plywood & Veneers Company Sdn Bhd; Yun Hing (Sabah) Sdn Bhd
• Lim Kok Liam & Sons Sdn Bhd v Lau Choon Wan (Leong Yok Chin Intervener)
• Tan Sri Khoo Teck Puat v Plenitude Holdings Sdn Bhd, SC
• Ong Seok Heng v Wee Cheong Motor & Housing Developer Sdn Bhd, HC
• Muhamed bin Sulaiman; PP
• R v Murphy (William)
• All persons in occupation of the house and the wooden stores erected on a portion of land held under Grant No 26977 for Lot 4271 in the Township of Johor Bahru, Johor v Punca Klasik Sdn Bhd
• Jaafar bin Shaari v Tan Lip Eng
• Kong Thai Sawmill (Miri) Sdn Bhd and Others (No 2); Ling Beng Sung v; Re Kong Thai Sawmill (Miri) Sdn Bhd

FOLLOWS

• Jaya Harta Realty Sdn Bhd v Koperasi Kemajuan Pekerja-Pekerja Ladang Bhd
• Dato' Hj Ghani Gilong; Kerajaan Malaysia
• Jasanusa Sdn Bhd; Kerajaan Malaysia

[See more]

• Browne v Dunn
• Chandrasekaran and Others v PP
• Che Wan Development Sdn Bhd v Co-operative Central Bank Bhd
• Dato' Mokhtar Hashim and Another v Public Prosecutor
• Davie v Magistrates of Edinburgh. Magistrates of Edinburgh v Brown
• Fowkes v Chadd
• Hopes and Lavery v H. M. Advocate
• Kong Nen Siew v Lim Siew Hong
• Monk v Bartram
• R v Oakley
• R v Silverlock
• Roper v Johnson
• Strutt v Whitnell
• T. C. Trustees Ltd v J. S. Darwen (Successors) Ltd
• Atkins v Great Western Railway Company
• Beckwith and Others v Sydebotham

REFERRED in

• Goh Cheng Kum dan satu lagi lwn Acepoint Venture Sdn Bhd dan lain-lain
• Ling Chick Ngai v Scott & English (M) Sdn Bhd
• Tan Tien Seng v Grobina Resorts Sdn Bhd (No.3)

[See more]

• Kosma Palm Oil Mill Sdn Bhd v Koperasi Serbausaha Makmur Bhd

FOLLOWED in

• Tan Kian Hua v Colour Image Scan Sdn Bhd (No.2)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] 7 MLJ 119

This document cites

• R v Oakley
• Strutt v Whitnell
• R v Murphy (William)
• T. C. Trustees Ltd v J. S. Darwen (Successors) Ltd
• Tropiland Sdn Bhd v DCB Bank



See all quotations

• Atkins v Great Western Railway Company
• Dato' Hj Ghani Gilong; Kerajaan Malaysia
• Paya Terubong Estate Sdn Bhd; Tan Geok Khoon & Gerard Francis Robless
• Soosan Trading Company Ltd v Tawau Auto Sdn Bhd and Others
• Chandrasekaran and Others v PP
• Kong Nen Siew v Lim Siew Hong
• Tambun Mining Company Ltd; Toeh Kee Keong
• TAC Construction & Trading v Bennes Engineering Bhd
• Che Wan Development Sdn Bhd v Co-operative Central Bank Bhd
• Fowkes v Chadd
• Jaya Harta Realty Sdn Bhd v Koperasi Kemajuan Pekerja-Pekerja Ladang Bhd
• Muhamed bin Sulaiman; PP
• Sandakan Plywood & Veneers Company Sdn Bhd; Yun Hing (Sabah) Sdn Bhd
• Hopes and Lavery v H. M. Advocate
• See Teow Guan v Kian Joo Holdings Sdn Bhd
• Ong Seok Heng v Wee Cheong Motor & Housing Developer Sdn Bhd, HC
• Kong Thai Sawmill (Miri) Sdn Bhd and Others (No 2); Ling Beng Sung v; Re Kong Thai Sawmill (Miri) Sdn Bhd
• All persons in occupation of the house and the wooden stores erected on a portion of land held under Grant No 26977 for Lot 4271 in the Township of Johor Bahru, Johor v Punca Klasik Sdn Bhd
• Wu Shu Chen v Raja Zainal Abidin bin Raja Hussin
• Dato' Mokhtar Hashim and Another v Public Prosecutor
• Labasama Group (M) Sdn Bhd v Insofex Sdn Bhd
• R v Silverlock
• Tan Sri Khoo Teck Puat v Plenitude Holdings Sdn Bhd, SC
• Lim Kok Liam & Sons Sdn Bhd v Lau Choon Wan (Leong Yok Chin Intervener)
• Jasanusa Sdn Bhd; Kerajaan Malaysia
• Jaafar bin Shaari v Tan Lip Eng
• Associated Metal Smelters Ltd; Tham Cheow Toh
• Roper v Johnson
• Tneoh Hong Seng v Dayani Sdn Bhd
• Monk v Bartram