Low Kar Yit and Others v Mohamed Isa and Another

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Rossiter v Miller

REFERS TO

• Truman v London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Company
• Chinnock v Marchioness of Ely
• Trollope (George) & Sons v Martyn Brothers

[See more]

• Von Hatzfeldt-Wildenburg v Alexander

FOLLOWS

• Spottiswoode, Ballantyne & Company Ltd v Doreen Appliances Ltd
• Von Hatzfeldt-Wildenburg v Alexander
• Winn v Bull

[See more]

• Chillingworth v Esche
• Coope v Ridout
• Eccles v Bryant
• Hutton v Watling
• Lockett v Norman-Wright
• Raingold v Bromley
• Rossdale v Denny

DISTINGUISHED in

• Ban Choon Company (Pte) Ltd; Chiong Ah Hui

FOLLOWED in

• Kapital Raya Sdn Bhd v Bloomville Corporation
• Koh Geok Noi; Ng Eng Hum
• Abdul Rahim bin Syed Mohd v Ramakrishnan Kandasamy

REFERRED in

• Nai Yau Juu v PASDEC Corporation Sdn Bhd
• Setiausaha Kerajaan Negeri Sembilan Darul Khusus and Another v Ns Water Konsortium Sdn Bhd and Others
• Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn Bhd v Pesaka Saujana Development Sdn Bhd

[See more]

• Kopeks Holdings Sdn Bhd v Bank Islam Malaysia Bhd
• Lim Eng Huat v Metroplex Project Management Sdn Bhd
• Quality Talent Sdn Bhd v Lee Joo Guan
• MMP Communications Sdn Bhd v Flyfirefly Sdn Bhd
• Deutsche Bank (Malaysia) Bhd v MBF Holdings Bhd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1963] 1 MLRH 377
• [1963] MLJ 165

This document cites

• Chinnock v Marchioness of Ely
• Rossdale v Denny
• Von Hatzfeldt-Wildenburg v Alexander
• Chillingworth v Esche
• Coope v Ridout



See all quotations

• Trollope (George) & Sons v Martyn Brothers
• Von Hatzfeldt-Wildenburg v Alexander
• Hutton v Watling
• Spottiswoode, Ballantyne & Company Ltd v Doreen Appliances Ltd
• Eccles v Bryant
• Raingold v Bromley
• Rossiter v Miller
• Lockett v Norman-Wright
• Truman v London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Company
• Winn v Bull