Loris James Appellant v Attorney General of Saint Christopher and Nevis Respondent [ECSC]

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Kariapper v Wijesinha
• Bribery Commissioner v Ranasinghe
• Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus

[See more]

• Attorney General of St Christopher and Nevis v Lawrence
• Heydon's Case
• Edward Benefield port quare impedit v Marmaduke Pickering & count q il
• John Pledall port Action de Transgr v V Villiam Knap & auters pur prisel de
• Collymore and Abraham v The Attorney‑General

REFERS TO

• Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart
• Attorney General of St. Christopher, Nevis and Anguilla v Reynolds
• Attorney General v Ryan

CONSIDERS

• Mills (Charles) and Another v Attorney-General of St Christopher and Nevis and Another
• Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju (Raja) v Vizagapatam Revenue Divisional Officer

APPLIES

• Attorney General for Alberta v Attorney General for Canada

This document cites

• Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart
• John Pledall port Action de Transgr v V Villiam Knap & auters pur prisel de
• Attorney General v Ryan
• Attorney General for Alberta v Attorney General for Canada
• Kariapper v Wijesinha



See all quotations

• Attorney General of St. Christopher, Nevis and Anguilla v Reynolds
• Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju (Raja) v Vizagapatam Revenue Divisional Officer
• Bribery Commissioner v Ranasinghe
• Heydon's Case
• Collymore and Abraham v The Attorney‑General
• Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus
• Edward Benefield port quare impedit v Marmaduke Pickering & count q il
• Mills (Charles) and Another v Attorney-General of St Christopher and Nevis and Another
• Attorney General of St Christopher and Nevis v Lawrence
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998
• Federal Cases - Kelo v. New London