A Local Authority v HB (First Respondent) MB (Second Respondent) ML and BL (by their Children's Guardian) (Third and Fourth Respondents)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Lancashire County Council v (by their Children's Guardian) (1st Respondents) M (2nd Respondent) F (3rd Respondent)
• A County Council v A Mother, A Father and X, Y and Z (by their Guardian)
• Gestmin SGPS S.A. v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd and Another

[See more]

• X (Children) and Another
• X (Children) (No 3)
• Darlington Borough Council v M and Others
• Shakeel Begg v British Broadcasting Corporation
• HB v A Local Authority (Local Government Association intervening)

REFERS TO

• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)
• Re T (Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• Rhesa Shipping Company S.A. v Edmunds (Popi M)

CONSIDERS

• Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
• Terrorism Act 2000 - Articles : S-1
• Terrorism Act 2000 - Articles : SCH-7

[See more]

• Children Act 1989
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-46
• Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-31

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2018] 1 FLR 625

This document cites

• X (Children) (No 3)
• Lancashire County Council v (by their Children's Guardian) (1st Respondents) M (2nd Respondent) F (3rd Respondent)
• Shakeel Begg v British Broadcasting Corporation
• X (Children) and Another
• Darlington Borough Council v M and Others



See all quotations

• A County Council v A Mother, A Father and X, Y and Z (by their Guardian)
• Rhesa Shipping Company S.A. v Edmunds (Popi M)
• Gestmin SGPS S.A. v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd and Another
• HB v A Local Authority (Local Government Association intervening)
• Re T (Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015
• Terrorism Act 2000
• Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
• Children Act 1989
• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)