Lindum Construction Company Ltd v Office of Fair Trading

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

CONSIDERS

• Competition Act 1998
• Monro v HM Revenue and Customs
• R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

[See more]

• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-2
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-31
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-46
• Enterprise Act 2002 - Articles : S-1
• Enterprise Act 2002 - Articles : S-12
• Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 - Articles : S-26
• Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 - Articles : S-25
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-36
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-37
• Competition Act 1998 (Determination of Turnover for Penalties) Order 2000
• The Competition Act 1998 (Determination of Turnover for Penalties) (Amendment) Order 2004
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-38
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-47
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-49
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : SCH-8
• The Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2003
• Enterprise Act 2002 - Articles : S-15
• Enterprise Act 2002 - Articles : SCH-4
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-47A
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-47B
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-58
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-58A
• Competition Act 1998 - Articles : S-60
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990 - Articles : S-285
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990

REFERS TO

• R v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Cox
• Bunney v Burns Anderson Plc
• Interclass Holdings Ltd and Another v Office of Fair Trading

[See more]

• Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council
• F. Hoffmann-LA Roche & Company A.G. and Others v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
• Re No. 56 Denton Road, Twickenham
• Interclass Holdings Ltd and Another v Office of Fair Trading
• The Office of Fair Trading v Somerfield Stores Ltd and Another
• Deutsche Bahn AG and Others v Morgan Crucible Company Plc and Others (European Commission intervening) [SC]

FOLLOWS

• Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs

APPLIES

• R v Wicks

CITES

• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Aken
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Pearlberg
• Pawlowski (Collector of Taxes) v Dunnington

RELIES UPON

• R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure Ltd and Others) v Westminster City Council
• British Steel Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
• Woolwich Equitable Building Society v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

[See more]

• Waikato Regional Airport Ltd v A-G of New Zealand

REFERRED in

• The Queen (on the application of (1) Gallaher Group Ltd and (2) Gallaher Ltd v Competition and Markets Authority
• HM Revenue & Customs Commissioners v John Patrick Walsh

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2014] WLR D 219
• [2015] 2 All ER 177

This document cites

• R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure Ltd and Others) v Westminster City Council
• Woolwich Equitable Building Society v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Pearlberg
• F. Hoffmann-LA Roche & Company A.G. and Others v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
• Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council



See all quotations

• R v Wicks
• Bunney v Burns Anderson Plc
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Aken
• Monro v HM Revenue and Customs
• Interclass Holdings Ltd and Another v Office of Fair Trading
• The Office of Fair Trading v Somerfield Stores Ltd and Another
• Re No. 56 Denton Road, Twickenham
• Pawlowski (Collector of Taxes) v Dunnington
• Century National Merchant Bank Ltd et Al v Davies et Al
• R v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Cox
• Interclass Holdings Ltd and Another v Office of Fair Trading
• British Steel Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
• Competition Act 1998
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990
• Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013
• Enterprise Act 2002
• The Competition Act 1998 (Determination of Turnover for Penalties) (Amendment) Order 2004
• Competition Act 1998 (Determination of Turnover for Penalties) Order 2000
• Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs
• R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• Deutsche Bahn AG and Others v Morgan Crucible Company Plc and Others (European Commission intervening) [SC]
• Galp Energía España, SA, Petróleos de Portugal (Petrogal) et Galp Energia, SGPS, SA v European Commission.