Lieut. Colonel James Frederick Dudley Crichton Stuart, - Appellant; The Most Honourable John Patrick Crichton Stuart, Marquis of Bute, and Earl of Dumfries, an infant, - Respondent (in the English Appeal), and Major General Charles Stuart, - Appellant; Lady Elizabeth Moore, Lieut. Colonel James F. D. C. Stuart, - Respondents (in the Scotch Appeals)
Linked as:
Extract
Lieut. Colonel James Frederick Dudley Crichton Stuart, - Appellant; The Most Honourable John Patrick Crichton Stuart, Marquis of Bute, and Earl of Dumfries, an infant, - Respondent (in the English Appeal), and Major General Charles Stuart, - Appellant; Lady Elizabeth Moore, Lieut. Colonel James F. D. C. Stuart, - Respondents (in the Scotch Appeals)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CITES
- The Marquess of Bute v Stuart
- Johnstone and Others v Stewart Beattie (an Infant)
- Dawson v Jay and Re Mary Jay Dawson, an Infant
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
CONSIDERED in
This document cites
- Beattie v Johnstone
- Mr. Justice Eyre v Countess of Shaftsbury
- Logan v Fairlee
- The Marquess of Bute v Stuart
- John Lockman Potinger, Sarah Frances Potinger, and Harriet Ann Potinger, Infants, by Richard Potinger, their next Friend, Plaintiffs; Robert Wightman and Harriet his Wife (late Harriet Potinger, Widow), William Brock, Benjamin Le Mesurier, Richard Potinger, Maria Potinger, William Potinger and Zelia Potinger, Infants, by Irving Brock their Guardian, William De Jersey, and Daniel De Lisle Brock, out of the Jurisdiction of the Court, John Thomas, Samuel Dubree, Moses David Getting, Newman Smith, and John Poingdestre, Defendants
