Lie Kee Pong v Chin Chow Yoon and Another

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Nottingham Patent Brick and Tile Company v Butler

REFERS TO

• Peh Kwee Yong v Sinar Company (Pte) Ltd
• Teo Hong Choo v Chin Kiang Industries Pte Ltd
• Wong Meng Yuen Eddie and Another v Soh Chee Kong and Others

[See more]

• Yandle & Sons v Sutton; Young v Sutton
• Chu Yik Man v S Rajagopal & Co and Another
• Lim Kim Lian v Swee Eng Heng and Another

FOLLOWS

• McGrory v Alderdale Estate Company
• Huang Ching Hwee v Heng Kay Pay and Another

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1998] SGHC 41
• [1998] 3 SLR 92

REFERRED in

• Ng Teck Sim Colin and another v Hat Holdings Pte Ltd and another

This document cites

• Yandle & Sons v Sutton; Young v Sutton
• Chin Kiang Industries Pte Ltd; Teo Hong Choo
• McGrory v Alderdale Estate Company
• Nottingham Patent Brick and Tile Company v Butler
• Lim Kim Lian v Swee Eng Heng and Another



See all quotations

• Soh Chee Kong and Others; Wong Meng Yuen Eddie and Another
• Lim Kim Lian v Swee Eng Heng and Another
• Peh Kwee Yong v Sinar Company (Pte) Ltd
• Wong Meng Yuen Eddie and Another v Soh Chee Kong and Others
• Teo Hong Choo v Chin Kiang Industries Pte Ltd
• Chu Yik Man v S Rajagopal & Co and Another
• Huang Ching Hwee v Heng Kay Pay and Another