Barriers, Hurdles, and Discrimination: The Current Status of LGBT Intercountry Adoption and Why Changes Must Be Made to Effectuate the Best Interests of the Child

This document cites

• Code of Federal Regulations - Orphan cases under section 101(b)(1)(F) of the Act (non-Hague Adoption Convention cases)
• Pennsylvania - In re Adoption of RBF
• Indiana - In re Adoption of S.A.
• New York - Matter of Emilio R.
• Indiana - Stout v. Tippecanoe County Dept. of Public Welfare



See all quotations

• New York - Matter of Carolyn B.
• California - Sharon S. v. Superior Court
• Nebraska - In re Adoption of Luke
• New York - Adoption of Joseph, In re
• New Hampshire - Jason C., In re, 86-301
• Indiana - In re Adoption of KSP
• Maryland - Conaway v. Deane
• Texas - Herd, In Interest of
• New York - Jacob, Matter of
• Minnesota - Welfare of D.L., Matter of
• Georgia - Johnson v. Taylor
• Maine - In re Adoption of M.A.
• Wisconsin - Angel Lace M., In Interest of
• Indiana - In re Adoption of MMGC, 45A03-0209-CV-287.
• Illinois - Petition of K.M.
• Federal Cases - Perry v. Schwarzenegger
• Florida - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN
• District of Columbia - IN RE M.M.D.
• Maryland - In re Adoption of Victor A.
• Indiana - In re Infant Girl W., 55A01-0506-JV-289.
• California - Strauss v. Horton
• Florida - Williams v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 94-368
• Maryland - Adoption/Guardianship No. 10941 in Circuit Court for Montgomery County, In re
• New Jersey - Adoption of Two Children by H.N.R., Matter of
• Vermont - Baker v. State
• Massachusetts - Adoption of Tammy
• Oklahoma - In re Adoption of CDM, 94,879.
• Vermont - Adoption of B.L.V.B., In re, 92-321