Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - Articles : S-25
• Housing Act 1985 - Articles : S-93
• Housing Act 1985 - Articles : S-82

[See more]

• Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - Articles : S-22
• Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - Articles : S-24
• Housing Act 1985 - Articles : S-84
• Housing Act 1985 - Articles : SCH-2
• Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - Articles : SCH-1
• Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - Articles : S-20
• Housing Act 1985 - Articles : S-83
• Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - Articles : S-4
• Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - Articles : S-5
• Housing Act 1985 - Articles : S-79
• Housing Act 1985 - Articles : S-81
• Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - Articles : S-21
• Housing Act 1988
• Housing Act 1996
• Disability Discrimination Act 2005
• Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - Articles : S-3A
• Housing Act 1988 - Articles : SCH-2
• Disability Discrimination Act 1995
• Mental Health Act 1983
• Housing Act 1985
• Williams v Richmond Court (Swansea) Ltd
• Taylor v OCS Group Ltd

REFERS TO

• Datec Electronic Holdings Ltd and Another and United Parcels Service Ltd and Another
• City of Bradford Metropolitan Council v McMahon
• O'Neill v Symm and Company Ltd

[See more]

• London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v Farnsworth
• R v Chief National Insurance Commissioner, ex parte Connor
• Assiscurazioni Generali SpA v Arab Insurance Group
• Todd v Adams
• Power v Panasonic UK Ltd
• North Devon Homes Ltd v Brazier
• BUPA Purchasing Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs
• R (Sivakumar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Ansell
• Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
• James v Eastleigh Borough Council
• Manchester City Council v Romano; Manchester City Council v Samari
• Doherty and Others v Birmingham City Council
• Wandsworth London Borough Council v Michalak
• Clark v Novacold Ltd
• H J Heinz Company Ltd v Kenrick
• McPhail v Persons, Names Unknown; Bristol Corporation v Ross
• Mercantile Credit Company Ltd v Hamblin
• Re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment)
• Avon County Council v Buscott
• Kay v Lambeth City Council; Leeds City Council v Price

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm

CITES

• Sepet and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Rowden v Dutton Gregory (A Firm)
• R (Sivakumar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• Aubergine Enterprises Ltd v Lakewood International Ltd
• Taylor v OCS Group Ltd
• Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart
• Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Quintavalle (on behalf of Pro-Life Alliance)
• Floyd v S (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)
• Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart
• Archibald v Fife Council
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• Sepet v SSHD
• Goodwin v Patent Office

APPROVES

• Floyd v S (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)

APPLIED in

• JP Morgan Europe Ltd v Chweidan
• JP Morgan Europe Ltd v Chweidan
• Child Support Agency (Dudley) v Truman

DISTINGUISHED in

• Floyd v S (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)
• Ian Burnip and Others v Birmingham City Council and Others
• Birmingham City Council v Mr Shakeel Afsar

REFERRED in

• R (Servier Laboratories Ltd) v The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
• R (N, A Minor, by her Mother and Litigation Friends SP) v Independent Appeal Panel of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
• Stafford and Rural Homes Ltd and another v Hughes

[See more]

• Wright v Croydon London Borough Council
• Cheltenham Borough Council v Laird
• Eagle Place Services Ltd v Rudd
• Andrew Williams v The Trustees of Swansea University Pension & Assurance Scheme and Another
• Brian Telchadder v Wickland (Holdings) Ltd
• Beedles v Guinness Northern Counties Ltd
• Governing Body of X Endowed Primary School v Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal and Others
• Martin v Devonshires Solicitors
• J v DLA Piper UK LLP
• Stockton on Tees Borough Council v Aylott
• Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd (formerly Flourish Homes Ltd)
• Andrew Williams v The Trustees of Swansea University Pension & Assurance Scheme and Another
• Robert Owen v Amec Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd
• Best v The Chief Land Registrar The Secretary of State for Justice (Interested Party)
• Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd
• Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council; Johnson v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

CITED in

• Storey v Government Communication Headquarters (GCHG)
• Thomas-Ashley v Drum Housing Association
• Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police v Jelic

[See more]

• Hall v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police
• Aitken v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• IPC Media Ltd v Millar
• Stafford and Rural Homes Ltd and another v Hughes
• Brill (Respondent/Claimant) v Interactive Business Communications Ltd
• T.l.m.p. V. A.p.
• Stockton on Tees Borough Council v Aylott
• Griffiths v The Secretary of State and Another
• Aster Communities Ltd (formerly Flourish Homes Ltd) v Jonathan Akerman-Livingstone
• R Best v The Chief Land Registrar The Secretary of State for Justice (Interested Party)
• City of York Council v P J Grosset

CONSIDERED in

• Mr Russell Chweidan v Mischcon De Reya Solicitors
• Ladak v DRC Locums Ltd
• Cordell v Foreign and Commonwealth Office [Employment Appeal Triubnal]

[See more]

• Royal Bank of Scotland v Ashton
• Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev
• Allen v The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc
• Winther, Huia Tamaka and Billy Taylor v Housing Corporation of New Zealand
• University of Birmingham v Persons Unknown
• G. v Department of Social Protection
• Adrian Arvunescu v Quick Release (Automotive) Ltd

COMMENTED in

• Fareham College v Walters
• The Governing Body of X School v SP and Another

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2008] 4 All ER 525
• 25/06/2008 Daily Cases
• [2008] L & TR 29

[See more]

• (2008) LR & I 215 7
• [2008] LGR 549
• [26/06/2008] TLR 2
• 102 BMLR 170
• [2008] HLR 41
• CSRC vol 32 iss 8/3
• [2008] IRLR 700
• [2008] NR Uned 254
• [2008] 3 WLR 194
• [2008] 1 AC 1399

This document cites

---

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Datec Electronic Holdings Ltd and Another and United Parcels Service Ltd and Another
• Clark v Novacold Ltd
• R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Quintavalle (on behalf of Pro-Life Alliance)
• Sepet v SSHD



See all quotations

• R (Sivakumar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• McPhail v Persons, Names Unknown; Bristol Corporation v Ross
• Wandsworth London Borough Council v Michalak
• Todd v Adams
• R (Sivakumar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Assiscurazioni Generali SpA v Arab Insurance Group
• Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart
• North Devon Homes Ltd v Brazier
• James v Eastleigh Borough Council
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• Manchester City Council v Romano; Manchester City Council v Samari
• London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Ansell
• Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart
• Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
• Taylor v OCS Group Ltd
• Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm
• Williams v Richmond Court (Swansea) Ltd
• BUPA Purchasing Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs
• Avon County Council v Buscott
• Floyd v S (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)
• Mercantile Credit Company Ltd v Hamblin
• Re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment)
• Floyd v S (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)
• R v Chief National Insurance Commissioner, ex parte Connor
• Aubergine Enterprises Ltd v Lakewood International Ltd
• Sepet and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Power v Panasonic UK Ltd
• O'Neill v Symm and Company Ltd
• London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v Farnsworth