Lewis v Guest, Keen & Nettlefold ; Watkins v Guest, Keen & Nettlefold ; Tucker v Guest, Keen & Nettlefold ; Ingram v Crawshay Brothers (Cyfartha)

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Walker v Cadzow Coal Company
• Black v Merry & Cuninghame, Ltd
• Fleet Iron Company, Ltd v Funck

[See more]

• Williams v Oakwood Colliery Company, Ltd
• McAlinden v Nimmo & Company
• Woodilee Coal and Coke Company v McNeill
• Heathcote v Haunchwood Collieries
• Thompson v Johnson (R) & Nephew
• McNally v Furness, Withy & Company Ltd
• Ball v William Hunt & Sons Ltd
• Macdonald v Wilsons and Clyde Coal Company
• Bevan v Energlyn Colliery Company
• Radcliffe v Pacific Steam Navigation Company
• James v Ocean Coal Company

APPLIES

• Portland Colliery Company v Murray. William Dixon Ltd v Madden
• Harwood v Wyken Colliery Company
• Cardiff Corporation v Hall

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1928] 1 KB 20
• 43 TLR 436

REFERRED in

• Bevan v Nixon's Navigation Company Ltd

This document cites

• Portland Colliery Company v Murray. William Dixon Ltd v Madden
• James v Ocean Coal Company
• Walker v Cadzow Coal Company
• Bevan v Energlyn Colliery Company
• McNally v Furness, Withy & Company Ltd



See all quotations

• Harwood v Wyken Colliery Company
• Woodilee Coal and Coke Company v McNeill
• Cardiff Corporation v Hall
• Heathcote v Haunchwood Collieries
• Radcliffe v Pacific Steam Navigation Company
• Macdonald v Wilsons and Clyde Coal Company
• Black v Merry & Cuninghame, Ltd
• McAlinden v Nimmo & Company
• Ball v William Hunt & Sons Ltd
• Thompson v Johnson (R) & Nephew
• Fleet Iron Company, Ltd v Funck
• Williams v Oakwood Colliery Company, Ltd