Lee Puey Hwa v Tay Cheow Seng

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Bey Jacqueline v Lee Yok Lung Edmond

REFERS TO

• Barnes (R M.) v Barnes (G. W.)
• Chambers v Chambers
• Davis v Davis

[See more]

• Fraser v Fraser
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• Robinson v Robinson (Disclosure)

FOLLOWS

• Allen v Allen
• Minton v Minton
• Barnes v Barnes

[See more]

• Bernard v Josephs
• Chambers v Chambers
• Cooke v Head
• Davis v Davis
• Ette v Ette
• Fraser v Fraser
• Krystman v Krystman
• Lombardi v Lombardi
• Millward v Millward
• Minton v Minton
• Robinson v Robson

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1991] SGCA 20
• [1991] SLR 198

FOLLOWED in

• Wan Lai Cheng v Quek Seow Kee
• Aym v Ayl
• Wee Ah Lian v Teo Siak Weng

[See more]

• Koh Kim Lan Angela v Choong Kian Haw and Another Appeal

REFERRED in

• Wan Lai Cheng v Quek Seow Kee

This document cites

• R v Holah
• Lombardi v Lombardi
• Krystman v Krystman
• Bernard v Josephs
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)



See all quotations

• Robinson v Robinson (Disclosure)
• Cooke v Head
• Davis v Davis
• Wachtel v Wachtel
• Minton v Minton
• Millward v Millward
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• Fraser v Fraser
• Barnes v Barnes
• Minton v Minton
• Davis v Davis
• Chambers v Chambers
• Barnes (R M.) v Barnes (G. W.)
• Allen v Allen
• Fraser v Fraser
• Robinson v Robson
• Chambers v Chambers
• Ette v Ette
• Bey Jacqueline v Lee Yok Lung Edmond