Lavesta Area Group Inc. v. Energy and Utilities Board (Alta.) et al., (2012) 522 A.R. 88

This document cites

• Ontario (Attorney General) v. Collins, [2012] O.A.C. Uned. 93
• Committee for Justice and Liberty Foundation et al. v. National Energy Board et al., (1976) 9 N.R. 115 (SCC)
• New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir, (2008) 329 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (SCC)
• R. v. S.M., (2005) 347 N.R. 196 (Motion)
• Alliance Pipeline Ltd. v. Smith, (2011) 412 N.R. 66 (SCC)



See all quotations

• Lavesta Area Group et al. v. Energy and Utilities Board (Alta.) et al., [2007] A.R. Uned. 329
• S.G. v. Larochelle et al., (2005) 363 A.R. 326 (CA)
• Bur et al. v. Energy and Utilities Board (Alta.), 2007 ABCA 210
• Gahir v. WCBAC, (2009) 448 A.R. 135 (CA)
• Boardwalk Reit LLP v. Edmonton, 2008 ABCA 176
• R. v. R.D.S., (1997) 218 N.R. 1 (SCC)
• Baker v. Can. (M.C.I.), (1999) 243 N.R. 22 (SCC)
• Wewayakum Indian Band v. Canada and Wewayakai Indian Band, (2003) 309 N.R. 201 (SCC)
• Lavesta Area Group et al. v. Energy and Utilities Board (Alta.) et al., [2009] A.R. Uned. 31 (CA)
• Lavesta Area Group Inc. v. Energy and Utilities Board (Alta.) et al., [2011] A.R. Uned. 44 (CA)
• Collins v. Canada, 2011 FCA 171
• Lavesta Area Group et al. v. Energy and Utilities Board (Alta.) et al., [2007] A.R. Uned. 600
• Ironside et al. v. Alberta Securities Commission, (2009) 454 A.R. 285 (CA)
• 2008/136/EC: Commission Decision of 22 June 2006 on the ad hoc financing of Dutch public service broadcasters C 2/2004 (ex NN 170/2003) (notified under document number C (2006)2084) (Text with EEA relevance)
• Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 151/2009 of 4 December 2009 amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement
• Commission Decision of 22 December 2006 setting up an expert group on transfer pricing
• 2005/31/EC: Council Decision of 24 September 2004 appointing a Netherlands member and a Netherlands alternate member of the Committee of the Regions
• Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 114/2006 of 22 September 2006 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement
• 2005/3/EC: Commission Decision of 3 January 2005 accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-circumvention investigation concerning anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 769/2002 on imports of coumarin originating in the People’s Republic of China by imports of coumarin consigned from India or Thailand, whether declared as originating in India or Thailand or not