Lambert v Lambert

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• L v L (Financial Provision: Contributions)
• Cordle v Cordle
• H v H (Financial Provision: Special Contribution)

[See more]

• H-J v H-J (Financial Provision: Equality)
• Cowan v Cowan
• Farmer v Bramley
• Figgins v Figgins

REFERS TO

• White v White
• Piglowski v Piglowski
• In the Marriage of L & F

CITES

• Duxbury v Duxbury

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-25
• Family Law Act 1996

REFERRED in

• William Randall Work v Mandy C Gray
• Chee Kok Choon v Sern Kuang Eng
• Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)

[See more]

• Eileen Elizabeth Graham v John Simpson Graham and John Samuel Graham
• Pauline Siew Phin Chai v Tan Sri Dr. Khoo Kay Peng and Others
• Kim Waggott v William H Waggott
• Anna Catherine Standish v Clive Thomas Standish
• Crammer (Beverley) v Linford Campbell
• Kennedy Jawahir Petitioner v Margaret Jawahir Respondent [ECSC]
• XW v XH

CITED in

• Hoffman & Hoffman
• Charman v Charman (No 2)
• Palmer & Palmer

[See more]

• Nahra and Notano
• Charman v Charman (No 2)
• Wight v Wight
• PM v PM
• Cooper-Hohn v Hohn
• Boswell (Dorothy Patricia) v Kenneth Delroy Boswell and Teino Boswell
• Valerie Ayala Gordon Appellant/Petitioner v Jefferson Raymond Watler Respondent/Respondent to Petition
• Lawrence Wheatley Appellant v Raishauna Wheatley Respondent
• Michael McIntyre Appellant v Margery Anne McIntyre Respondent
• Barbara Joseph Petitioner v Rytis Joseph Respondent [ECSC]
• Kathlyn Rose Olive Petitioner v Francis Olive Respondent [ECSC]

CONSIDERED in

• Stephen Thomas Foster v Stephen Thomas Foster
• CG v IF (inter-relationship: Pt III Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 and Lugano Convention)
• Q and Q

[See more]

• K v K (Financial Relief: Management of Difficult Cases)
• J v J (Ancillary Relief: Periodical Payments)
• H v H
• Wight v Wight
• Norris v Norris
• Gw (Petitioner) v Rw
• M v M
• S v G
• RR
• S v T
• McCartney v Mills McCartney
• Sharp v Sharp
• KH v RH
• Jawahir v Jawahir
• Kim Joseph Née Noel v Stephen Joseph
• McIntyre v McIntyre
• Phillip v Phillip
• Nanton v Nanton
• Pinder (nee Johnson) v Pinder
• Mills v Mills
• S v M
• Ssw v Jaw
• Farrell v Farrell
• Major v Major
• Sequea v Sequea
• Kim Joseph Née Noel v Stephen Joseph
• G v A
• Rgh v Jfh
• Handler-ruiz v Haydon
• Joseph v Joseph
• Between: J.M. Petitioner v K.M. Respondent
• Between: J.M. Petitioner v K.M. Respondent
• DS v GE
• Vidrine v Vidrine
• Eileen Veronica Smith v Lloyd Ethelbert Smith
• Marshall v Marshall
• Joseph v Joseph
• Samlal v Samlal
• Bollers v Cevene
• Norris v Norris
• Geoffrey Grahame Bollers Petitioner v Lynn Marie Cevene Respondent [ECSC]
• Fitzgerald George v Burnette Barry-George
• Toovey v Toovey
• Nidhan v Nidhan
• Timothy Stonich Appellant v Tamara Stonich Respondent
• Charman v Charman (No 2)
• Samlal v Samlal
• S v S
• Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)
• Sorrell v Sorrell
• Telesford v Telesford
• Wheatley v Wheatley

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 14/11/2002 Daily Cases
• [2003] 1 FLR 139
• [2003] 4 All ER 342

[See more]

• [27/11/2002] TLR 2
• [2003] 2 WLR 631
• [2003] FAM 103
• [2002] 3 Fam CR 673

COMMENTED in

• D (B) v D (J)

RELIED UPON in

• In the matter of the estate of Patrick O'Neill Deceased: Veronica O'Neill, Terence O'Neill and Joseph O'Neill v John Richard McPhillimy, Elizabeth McKay and Ciara O'Neill (a minor) and Christopher O'Neill (a minor) by Kevin O'Neill their Father and Guardian Ad Litem

APPLIED in

• Jenifer Eileen Evans v Mark Stephen Evans
• Lawrence Wheatley v Raishauna Wheatley

This document cites

---

• Cowan v Cowan
• Duxbury v Duxbury
• White v White
• Piglowski v Piglowski
• Cordle v Cordle



See all quotations

• In the Marriage of L & F
• H v H (Financial Provision: Special Contribution)
• H-J v H-J (Financial Provision: Equality)
• L v L (Financial Provision: Contributions)
• Figgins v Figgins
• Farmer v Bramley
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Family Law Act 1996