KS (Benefit of the Doubt)
Linked as:
Extract
KS (Benefit of the Doubt)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- NA (UT Rule 45: Singh v Belgium) Iran
- TS v London Borough of Croydon
- AA (Unattended Children) Afghanistan
[See more]
REFERS TO
- KA (Afghanistan) and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Hk (Afghanistan) and Others by Their Solicitor and Litigation Friend, Kamaljit Sandhu v Secretary of State for the Home Department
FOLLOWS
- MD (Guinea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- SR (IRAN) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Nalliah Karanakaran v Secretary of State for The Home Department
AFFIRMS
CITES
- ZJ (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- PJ (Sri Lanka) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
CONSIDERS
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Sivakumaran
- Randhawa v Minister for Immigration Local Government and Ethnic Affairs
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CONSIDERED in
- MS (Trafficking – Tribunal’s Powers – Art. 4 ECHR)
- PD and Others (Article 8 - Conjoined Family Claims) Sri Lanka
CITED in
APPLIED in
This document cites
- ZJ (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- TS v London Borough of Croydon
- DS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Hk (Afghanistan) and Others by Their Solicitor and Litigation Friend, Kamaljit Sandhu v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Nalliah Karanakaran v Secretary of State for The Home Department
