Krotov v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• B v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment
• R (Abassi and another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another
• Oppenheimer v Cattermole

[See more]

• Sepet and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Shah
• The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament v The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Others
• Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company (Nos 4 & 5)
• Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Sepet v SSHD

REFERS TO

• Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R v IAT, ex parte Shah
• Brown v Stott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline)
• Ciric v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) [TD],

[See more]

• R (CND) v Prime Minister

APPLIES

• B v Secretary of State for the Home Department (DEPORTATION: PROPORTIONALITY)

CONSIDERS

• R (Abassi and another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another
• Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company (Nos 4 & 5)
• Oppenheimer v Cattermole

[See more]

• Buck v Attorney General
• Sepet and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Prosecutor v Tadic (Judgment) (Case no IT-94-1-T)
• Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CONSIDERED in

• AK (Russia-Chechnya deserter)
• IS (Concession made by representative)
• BE (Military service – Punishment – Landmines)

[See more]

• Ba (Military Service – No Risk)
• MA (Operational Guidance - prison conditions – significance)
• Zq (Serving Soldier)
• FN (Article 8 – removal- viable options)
• PK (Anonymity Direction Made) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Mbanjabahizi (Claimant) Immigration Appeal Tribunal (Defendant) Secretary of State for The Home Department (Interested Party)
• HH & others (Mogadishu: armed conflict: risk)
• AM (Sudan Draft evader)
• KH (Article 15©)
• BE (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ps (Prison Conditions; Military Service)
• Am & Am (Armed Conflict: Risk Categories)

REFERRED in

• Khan v Royal Air Force Summary Appeal Court
• PK (Ukraine) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 11/02/2004 Daily Cases
• [26/02/2004] TLR 7
• [2004] 1 WLR 1825

CITED in

• S (P) & S (L) v Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Min for Justice

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Sepet v SSHD
• Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Sepet and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company (Nos 4 & 5)



See all quotations

• Buck v Attorney General
• Oppenheimer v Cattermole
• R (CND) v Prime Minister
• R (Abassi and another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another
• R (Abassi and another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another
• B v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment
• R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Shah
• Oppenheimer v Cattermole
• Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R v IAT, ex parte Shah
• Sepet and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• B v Secretary of State for the Home Department (DEPORTATION: PROPORTIONALITY)
• Brown v Stott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline)
• Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company (Nos 4 & 5)
• The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament v The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Others
• Convention relating to the Status of Refugees
• Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees
• Ciric v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) [TD],
• Prosecutor v Tadic (Judgment) (Case no IT-94-1-T)