Kowalski v. Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - U.S. v. Hayes, 78-5347
• Arkansas - Marlar v. Daniel
• Indiana - Hooks SuperX, Inc. v. McLaughlin
• Pennsylvania - Coyle by Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.
• Arkansas - Mitchell v. Lincoln



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - Tinder v. Lewis County Nursing Home Dist.
• Massachusetts - Cottam v. CVS Pharmacy
• Arkansas - Pope v. Overton
• Tennessee - Dooley v. Everett
• Arkansas - Williamson v. Elrod
• Arkansas - Young v. Paxton
• Alabama - Walls v. Alpharma USPD, Inc.
• Arkansas - Brock v. Townsell
• Federal Cases - Nichols v. St. Luke Center of Hyde Park
• Federal Cases - United States v. Moore
• Texas - Morgan v Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
• Federal Cases - Kohl v. American Home Products Corp., Civ. 99-3085.
• Arizona - Lasley v. Shrake's Country Club Pharmacy, Inc.
• Florida - Estate of Johnson v. Badger Acquisition
• Arkansas - West v. Searle & Co.
• Federal Cases - Concourse Rehab. & Nursing Ctr. v. Whalen
• Federal Cases - NYS Conference Blue Cross v. Travelers Ins.
• Mississippi - Moore ex rel. Moore v. Memorial Hosp. of Gulfport
• Arkansas - Young v. Gastro-Intestinal Center, Inc.
• Pennsylvania - Riff v. Morgan Pharmacy
• Federal Cases - Brogdon ex rel. Cline v. National Healthcare Corp.
• Arkansas - Kowalski v. Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc.
• Arkansas - Rose Care, Inc. v. Ross
• Missouri - Horner v. Spalitto
• US - Reference Stubs - Prohibited acts A
• US - Reference Stubs - Definitions
• US - Reference Stubs - Purpose of issue of prescription
• US - Reference Stubs - Prescriptions
• US - Reference Stubs - Congressional findings and declarations: controlled substances
• US - Reference Stubs - Exemption from separate registration for practitioners dispensing or prescribing Schedule III, IV, or V narcotic controlled drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration specifically for use in maintenance or detoxification treatment