Koleje Mazowieckie – KM Sp. z o.o. contra Skarb Państwa – Minister Infrastruktury i Budownictwa obecnie Minister Infrastruktury i Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego y PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Koleje Mazowieckie – KM Sp. z o.o. contra Skarb Państwa – Minister Infrastruktury i Budownictwa obecnie Minister Infrastruktury i Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego y PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A.

This document cites

• Eesti Pagar AS v Ettevõtluse Arendamise Sihtasutus and Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium.
• M. G. Eman and O. B. Sevinger v College van burgemeester en wethouders van Den Haag.
• Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Factortame Ltd and others.
• CTL Logistics GmbH v DB Netz AG.
• Hochtief Solutions AG Magyarországi Fióktelepe contra Fővárosi Törvényszék.



See all quotations

• European Commission v Republic of Poland.
• Directive 2007/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community’s railways and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure
• Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 of the Council of 26 June 1969 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway
• Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2016/C 202/01
• Council Directive 91/440/EEC of 29 July 1991 on the development of the Community's railways
• Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 14 mai 2020.#FMS et FNZ contre Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság et Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique d’asile et d’immigration – Directive 2013/32/UE – Demande de protection internationale – Article 33, paragraphe 2 – Motifs d’irrecevabilité – Article 40 – Demandes ultérieures – Article 43 – Procédures à la frontière – Directive 2013/33/UE – Article 2, sous h), et articles 8 et 9 – Rétention – Légalité – Directive 2008/115/UE – Article 13 – Voies de recours effectives – Article 15 – Rétention – Légalité – Droit à un recours effectif – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Principe de primauté du droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-924/19 PPU.