King v Royal Bank of Canada Europe Ltd

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd

REFERS TO

• Khudados v Leggate

CONSIDERS

• Seddington v Virgin Media Ltd

CITES

• Muschett v HM Prison Service
• Nothman v London Borough of Barnet (No.2)
• Polkey v A. E. Dayton Services Ltd

[See more]

• Keen v Commerzbank AG
• Cowley v Manson Timber Ltd
• Jones v Governing Body of Burdett Coutts School
• Jurkowska v Hlmad Ltd
• Sinclair Roche & Temperley v Heard
• Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews
• United Arab Emirates v Abdelghafar

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2012] IRLR 280

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• King v Royal Bank of Canada Europe Ltd

CONSIDERED in

• Leacock v Pmm Services Ltd (a.k.a. Kpmg)
• Joel Leacock v PMM Services Ltd

This document cites

• Cowley v Manson Timber Ltd
• Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd
• Jones v Governing Body of Burdett Coutts School
• Polkey v A. E. Dayton Services Ltd
• Keen v Commerzbank AG



See all quotations

• Khudados v Leggate
• Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews
• Seddington v Virgin Media Ltd
• United Arab Emirates v Abdelghafar
• Nothman v London Borough of Barnet (No.2)
• Sinclair Roche & Temperley v Heard
• Jurkowska v Hlmad Ltd
• Muschett v HM Prison Service