Khan v. Shim, H041608

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Mirpad v. California Ins. Guarantee Assn.

CITED FOR CONTRAST in

• Stella v. Asset Mgmt. Consultants, Inc.

SUMMARIZED OPINION OF in

• Khan v. Shim

This document cites

• California - Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp.
• California - Palmer v. Shawback
• California - Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
• California - Santisas v. Goodin
• California - Stout v. Turney



See all quotations

• California - Loube v. Loube
• California - Akins v. Enterprise Rent-a-Car Co.
• California - Del Cerro Mobile Estates v. Proffer
• California - Casella v. Southwest Dealer Services, Inc.
• California - Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.
• California - Allstate Ins. Co. v. Loo
• California - Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.
• California - Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.
• California - Hastings v. Matlock
• California - Lerner v. Ward
• California - Reynolds Metals Co. v. Alperson
• California - Gil v. Mansano
• California - Cruz v. Ayromloo
• California - Mirpad v. California Ins. Guarantee Assn.
• US - Reference Stubs - Word understood in ordinary and popular sense
• US - Reference Stubs - Measure and mode of attorney's compensation left to agreement
• US - Reference Stubs - Items allowable as costs
• US - Reference Stubs - Language governs interpretation
• US - Reference Stubs - Contract providing for award of attorney's fees and costs incurred in enforcing contract
• US - Reference Stubs - Intention ascertained from writing
• US - Reference Stubs - Right of prevailing party to recover costs
• US - Reference Stubs - Mutual intention of parties