New York v. Kent: using temporary Internet files to prove possession of child pornography.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 455 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2006), 04-10648, United States v. Romm
• Federal Cases - 305 F.3d 1193 (10th Cir. 2002), 01-4150, U.S. v. Tucker
• Federal Cases - 411 F.3d 1198 (10th Cir. 2005), 04-6049, United States v. Bass
• Alaska - 213 P.3d 144 (Alaska App. 2009), A-10005, Worden v. State
• Alabama - 994 So.2d 293 (Ala.Crim.App. 2007), CR-05-1277, Ward v. State



See all quotations

• Arizona - 173 P.3d 1046 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 2008), 1 CA-CR 06-0376, State v. Jensen
• Georgia - 648 S.E.2d 660 (Ga.App. 2007), A07A0486, Barton v. State
• Illinois - 914 N.E.2d 607 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 2009), 1-07-2147, People v. Josephitis
• Ohio - 909 N.E.2d 653 (Ohio App. 5 Dist. 2009), 2008-CA-0104, State v. Hurst
• New York - 96 N.Y.2d 318, People v. Fraser
• Pennsylvania - 970 A.2d 1100 (Pa. 2009), Commonwealth v. Diodoro
• Texas - 278 S.W.3d 836 (Tex.App.-Houston [14 Dist.] 2009), 14-08-00607, Gant v. State
• Wisconsin - 782 N.W.2d 125 (Wis.App. 2010), 2008AP1763-CR, State v. Mercer