The Kelo Effect: Eminent Domain and Property Rights in Louisiana

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 265 F. 354 (E.D.S.C. 1920), 788, Filbin Corp. v. United States
• Federal Cases - 467 U.S. 229 (1984), 83-141, Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff
• Federal Cases - 503 U.S. 407 (1992), National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corporation
• Federal Cases - 539 U.S. 558 (2003), 02-102, Lawrence v. Texas
• Federal Cases - 545 U.S. 469 (2005), 04-108, Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 166 U.S. 226 (1897), 129, Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago
• Federal Cases - 3 U.S. 386 (1798), Calder v. Bull
• Federal Cases - 262 U.S. 700 (1923), 237, Rindge Company v. County of Los Angeles
• Federal Cases - 277 U.S. 438 (1928), Olmstead v. United States
• Federal Cases - 113 U.S. 1 (1885), Cole v. City of La Grange
• Federal Cases - 302 U.S. 583 (1938), 37, Wright v. United States
• Federal Cases - 348 U.S. 26 (1954), 22, Berman v. Parker
• Federal Cases - 381 U.S. 479 (1965), 496, Griswold v. Connecticut
• Federal Cases - 383 U.S. 663 (1966), 48, Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections
• Federal Cases - 394 U.S. 557 (1969), 293, Stanley v. Georgia
• Arizona - 38 P.2d 878 (Ariz. 1934), Civ. 3566, In re Application of Forsstrom
• Louisiana - 794 So.2d 962 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2001), 34,958, City of Shreveport v. Chanse Gas Corp.
• Michigan - 304 N.W.2d 455 (Mich. 1981), 66294, Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of Detroit
• Michigan - 684 N.W.2d 765 (Mich. 2004), 124070, County of Wayne v. Hathcock
• North Carolina - 131 S.E. 413 (N.C. 1926), 464, Griffith v. Southern Ry. Co.
• New York - 270 N.Y. 333, New York City Housing Authority v. Muller
• Connecticut - 843 A.2d 500 (Conn. 2004), 16742, Kelo v. City of New London