Kelly v Irish Sugar Company (No. 1) [Supreme Court.]

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Stuart v Nixon and Bruce
• Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1934

REFERS TO

• Scott v Summerlee Iron Company

CITES

• Jones v Ocean Coal Company
• Giles v Belford, Smith & Company
• Perry v Wright ; Cain v Frederick Leyland & Company (1900) Ltd ; Bailey v Kenworthy (G. H.) Ltd ; Gough v Crawshay Brothers, Cyfartha Ltd

[See more]

• Barnett v Port of London Authority ; Priestley v Port of London Authority
• Cox v Trollope (George) & Sons
• Godden v Cowlin (W.) & Son
• Twidale v London and North Eastern Ry. Company

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1941] IR 353

This document cites

• Stuart v Nixon and Bruce
• Anslow v Cannock Chase Colliery Company
• Twidale v London and North Eastern Ry. Company
• Cox v Trollope (George) & Sons
• Hathaway v Argus Printing Company



See all quotations

• Scott v Summerlee Iron Company
• Jones v Ocean Coal Company
• Kelly v Mayo County Council
• Perry v Wright ; Cain v Frederick Leyland & Company (1900) Ltd ; Bailey v Kenworthy (G. H.) Ltd ; Gough v Crawshay Brothers, Cyfartha Ltd
• Anslow v Cannock Chase Colliery Company
• Giles v Belford, Smith & Company
• Barnett v Port of London Authority ; Priestley v Port of London Authority
• Godden v Cowlin (W.) & Son
• Summers v Rhondda Urban District Council
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1897
• Gill v Grainger Bros