Karen Louise Oakley v South Cambridgeshire District Council Len Satchell (Interested Party)
Linked as:
Extract
Karen Louise Oakley v South Cambridgeshire District Council Len Satchell (Interested Party)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REFERS TO
CITES
- R v Higher Education Funding Council, ex parte Institute of Dental Surgery
- R v Aylesbury Vale District Council and Another, ex parte Chaplin and Others
- Lloyd (A.P.) and Others (A.P.) v McMahon
CONSIDERS
- R Luton Borough Council v Central Bedfordshire Council Houghton Regis Development Consortium (Interested Party)
- Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 - Articles : S-38
- Town and Country Planning Act 1990 - Articles : S-70
CONSIDERED in
CITED in
REFERRED in
- Rika Shasha, Toni Shasha and Rownamoor Trustees Ltd as Trustees of the Placement Pension Fund v Westminster City Council Portman Mansions Residents Company Ltd (Interested Party)
- Hawksworth Securities Plc v Peterborough City Council Ireef Queensgate Peterborough Propco S.A.R.L and Others (Interested Parties)
This document cites
- R Luton Borough Council v Central Bedfordshire Council Houghton Regis Development Consortium (Interested Party)
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
- Lloyd (A.P.) and Others (A.P.) v McMahon
- R v Higher Education Funding Council, ex parte Institute of Dental Surgery
- R v Aylesbury Vale District Council and Another, ex parte Chaplin and Others
