Kane v McMahon

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Russell v Fanning
• Sir Rafe Longforth seisi de Advouson de Marlborough present un que fuit admit

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Kane v McMahon

CONSIDERS

• Extradiction Act, 1965 - Articles : S-50
• Extradiction Act, 1965 - Articles : S-44
• Constitution of Ireland 1937/Bunreacht na hÉireann - Articles : S-40

REFERS TO

• McMahon v Leahy
• Shannon v Fanning

APPLIES

• Finucane v McMahon
• McGlinchey v Wren
• State (Holmes) v Furlong

[See more]

• Quinn v Wren
• Russell v Fanning

FOLLOWS

• Bourke v Attorney-General and Wymes

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 1990 WJSC-SC 212
• [1990] 4 JIC 0604
• [1990] ILRM 802

[See more]

• [1990] 1 IR 239 (Digest)
• [1990] 1 IR 239

CITED in

• Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh

REFERRED in

• Ellis v O'Dea (No. 2)

CONSIDERED in

• The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v J.C.

This document cites

---

• McGlinchey v Wren
• Russell v Fanning
• Quinn v Wren
• Finucane v McMahon
• Russell v Fanning



See all quotations

• State (Quinn) v Ryan
• Shannon v Ireland
• Shannon v Fanning
• Sir Rafe Longforth seisi de Advouson de Marlborough present un que fuit admit
• State (Holmes) v Furlong
• Bourke v Attorney-General and Wymes
• McMahon v Leahy
• Criminal Law (Jurisdiction) Act, 1976