Julaika Bivi v Mydin

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Hill v Tupper

REFERS TO

• Wijesuriya (H. E.) v Attorney General for Ceylon
• Glenwood Lumber Company v Phillips
• Ackroyd v Samuel Smith and Thomas Smith

[See more]

• Cobb v Lane

FOLLOWS

• Ackroyd v Smithson
• Bristow v Cormican
• Cobb v Lane

[See more]

• Danford v McAnulty
• Glenwood Lumber Company v Phillips
• Mason v Clarke
• Mason v Clarke

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1961] MLJ 310

FOLLOWED in

• Fatimah; Mohamed Said
• Hong Hin Tin Mining Co; Wong See Kui
• Hassan and Another; Senik

[See more]

• Kunji Mohidin; Mohamed

This document cites

• Mason v Clarke
• Mason v Clarke
• Cobb v Lane
• Bristow v Cormican
• Hill v Tupper



See all quotations

• Ackroyd v Smithson
• Danford v McAnulty
• Ackroyd v Samuel Smith and Thomas Smith