Max Fuchs v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Linked as:
Extract
Max Fuchs v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
WORK EXPRESSION OF in
This document cites
- Hans-Peter Wilfer v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
- Cadila Healthcare Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., formerly Pathe Communications Corporation.
- T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA.
- Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas.