Gérard Meric v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Gérard Meric v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

This document cites

• Grupo Sada, pa, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Solo Italia Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Vedial SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Alcon Inc, formerly Alcon Universal Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).



See all quotations

• Ampafrance SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• El Corte Inglés, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (Trade marks and designs) (OHIM).
• Audi AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., formerly Pathe Communications Corporation.
• Sadas SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• New Look Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
• Pedro Díaz, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Bunker & BKR, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Jean-Pierre Koubi v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• DaimlerChrysler Corporation v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• José Alejandro, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Claudia Oberhauser v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• GE Betz Inc., formerly BetzDearborn Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Matratzen Concord GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
• Wassen International Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co. GmbH contra Klijsen Handel BV.
• Institut für Lernsysteme GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• SABEL BV contra Puma AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport.
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark
• Treaty establishing the European Community