Pi-Design AG and Others v Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-337/12 P and C-339/12 P) and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd (C-338/12 P and C-340/12 P).
Linked as:
Extract
Pi-Design AG and Others v Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-337/12 P and C-339/12 P) and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd (C-338/12 P and C-340/12 P).
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Ralf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt.
- DMK Deutsches Milchkontor GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
- Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys v Registrar of Trade Marks.
- Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
- Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd.
