Peek & Cloppenburg KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Peek & Cloppenburg KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

This document cites

• Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
• London Development Agency Act 2003
• Vedial SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH (WSC) contra Boots- und Segelzubehör Walter Huber y Franz Attenberger.
• Vedial SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).



See all quotations

• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company.
• GE Betz Inc., formerly BetzDearborn Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Nordmilch eG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark
• Treaty establishing the European Community