Monika Kušionová v SMART Capital, a.s.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Monika Kušionová v SMART Capital, a.s.

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (Text with EEA relevance)
• Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning misleading advertising
• Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests
• Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union



See all quotations

• Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts
• Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts - Statement by the Council and the Parliament re Article 6 (1) - Statement by the Commission re Article 3 (1), first indent
• Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC
• Tratado de la Unión Europea
• Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) (Text with EEA relevance)Text with EEA relevance
• Treaty establishing the European Community
• ROUSK v. SWEDEN
• McCANN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM