XXXLutz Marken GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF in

• XXXLutz Marken GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

This document cites

• Henkel KgaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Aceites del Sur-Coosur SA v Koipe Corporación SL and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., formerly Pathe Communications Corporation.
• Prana Haus GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas.



See all quotations

• Audi AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• L'Oréal SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Sergio Rossi SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
• Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co. GmbH contra Klijsen Handel BV.
• Société des Produits Nestlé SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance)
• Council Regulation (EC) No 422/2004 of 19 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (Text with EEA relevance)
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark