Audi AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Audi AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

This document cites

• Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
• Henkel KgaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Eurohypo AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Audi AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).



See all quotations

• Merz & Krell GmbH & Co..
• Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Erpo Möbelwerk GmbH.
• August Storck KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Council Regulation (EC) No 3288/94 of 22 December 1994 amending Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark for the implementation of the agreements concluded in the framework of the Uruguay Round
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark