Metso Paper Automation Oy v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Metso Paper Automation Oy v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

This document cites

• Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
• SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Wieland-Werke AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company.
• Anne Geddes v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).



See all quotations

• Vitaly Lissotschenko and Joachim Hentze v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
• SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• HERON Robotunits GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark