Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF in

• [2011] ETMR 4
• 62009CJ0265
• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG.

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2011] ETMR 4
• 62009CJ0265

This document cites

• Koninklijke KPN Nederland NV v Benelux-Merkenbureau.
• SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Eurohypo AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Mag Instrument Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
• Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau.



See all quotations

• Develey Holding GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Heidelberger Bauchemie GmbH.
• Audi AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• KWS Saat AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Erpo Möbelwerk GmbH.
• August Storck KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance)
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark